tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5970683153008645393.post2307235138691207073..comments2024-01-09T16:17:22.327-06:00Comments on Bring the Books: The Transcendental Argument (Part 1)Adam Parkerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05826908205996140341noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5970683153008645393.post-30375595903634391612008-08-08T11:34:00.000-05:002008-08-08T11:34:00.000-05:00Even given the presupposition that for man to have...Even given the presupposition that for man to have knowledge then God must exist (questionable to begin with, since it very well could be the case that in a world in which mankind exists apart from God that mankind also has knowledge in such a world... we have no way of knowing that such a world is impossible - and if you object to this objection you can only do so by appeal to the cosmological argument thereby making the TAG obsolete), it must also be true that man has knowledge. If man does not have knowledge then the idea that God must exist in order for him to have it is completely insignificant. Further, man does not have knowledge, making the primary presupposition insignificant. <BR/><BR/>But I still look forward to the attempt.The heretichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10975079854569187569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5970683153008645393.post-62261061977400549292008-07-30T14:48:00.000-05:002008-07-30T14:48:00.000-05:00I look forward to your posts on this topic. I just...I look forward to your posts on this topic. I just wanted to note (since some people I have read aren't aware) that Clark used the term presuppositional in a different sense. He used it to explain the fact that everyone presupposes a view of the world. This is their starting point, their axiom. It is presupposed, not proven. In this regard he would differ from TAG, which is an attempt to prove the existence of God.Brandonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15693380017090778540noreply@blogger.com